Sick Nurse
The GOONIES
Tower of evil (mon film d'horreur des années 70 préférer)
Dreamscape
Hellboy 2
The pit/Hellgates

pour répondre a ta question:

Tower of evil ressemble a un film de la HAMMER, sans en être un...trés atmosphérique et il a c'est moment sanglant!! l'histoire en gros c'est des cadavres de jeunes gens sont retrouvé sur une île où il y a un phare abandonné, une survivante y est retrouver ainsi qu'un artifact très rare car une légende raconte qu'un trésor y est caché, alors une expédition est monté et envoyé sur l'île pour découvrir le trésors ainsi que résoudre les meurtres!!!! c'est un mélange de slasher, de film d'aventure, c'est très dur a décrire, mais c'est un excellent film qui ma marquer quand j'étais jeune et je suis très heureux d'avoir mis la main sur le dvd!!!!

Sick Nurse c'est disons assez bizzard mais intéressant, c'est un film thailandais, très esthétiques et je dois avouer l'histoire intéressante et a une fin innattendu... c'est une histoire de fantôme vengeur mais sans vraiment tombée dans les clichés du genre. Très gore comme film, j'ai passé un très bon moment en le regardant!

J'ai enfin acheter ce film (vraiment) culte de Stuart gordon que j'avais vu il y a longtemps sur une vielle vhs. Mais maintenant je peux l'écouté dans une édition plus respectable.

Et pour répondre à la question de blinvander. Je ne le sais pas mais voici les suplément.

The 30th anniversary edition of Night of the Living Dead will no doubt go down in history as one of filmdom's greatest oddities. In 1968, a group of Pittsburgh filmmakers made one of the scariest horror films of all time. Night of the Living Dead was groundbreaking, influential and shocking all at once. Originally panned by some critics, the film went on to continued success and spawned two sequels years later. In 1998, for the film's 30th anniversary, original co-writer John A. Russo decided to write and direct new scenes and insert them into the original film. Not since the colorization of old movies have I heard of a more ludicrous form of film rape.

Adding new scenes isn't the end of it. A new musical score, re-editing and re-mastering are the three other major changes to the film. Of these changes, only the re-mastering is a complete success. The 1999 DVD release of the 30th anniversary is the best version I've ever seen. The image is far clearer and sharper than anything before. Gone is the grainy look of old; now we get pictures in which blurred images are now distinguishable. I have to congratulate the folks who made this film look so good. If this had been the only change to the film, then I would have nothing but cheers, but unfortunately, Russo's tinkering has greatly diminished the original film's integrity and quality.


The new version begins at a building, in front of which two guys load a coffin onto the back of a truck. Russo tells us, on the commentary track, that the movie begins "slightly" differently than the 1968 film. This slightly different opening lasts for over five minutes, before we cut back to the original film, in which we see Johnny (Russell Streiner) and Barbra (Judith O'Dea) arrive at the cemetery. The purpose of this new beginning is to provide us with the back-story of the cemetery zombie, played by William Hinzman. Did we really need to know where he came from?

The DVD commentary track features director John A. Russo, producer Russ Streiner, photographer and actor William Hinzman and producer Robert Michelucci, all of whom were involved with the making of the original film. Russo informs us that he and George Romero had wanted to make this new version, but when Romero began writing another movie, Russo decided to take the reigns himself and create a new beginning, insert small scenes throughout the film and tack on a different ending. Maybe in Romero's hand, this would have worked. In Russo's hand, we get terrible acting and poor synching. Observe, during the new beginning, the awful performances (especially by Scott Vladimir Licina as a priest) and the fact that the voices don't match the lips of the actors.


Hinzman reprises his role as the cemetery zombie, and on the making-of featurette, we see him being made up to look like his younger self 30 years ago. Sorry, but it didn't work. The movie cuts from his new footage back to the old footage, and we can plainly see that his age shows.


The new score, by Scott Vladimir Licina (the priest), is sometimes effective, but I noticed how the suspense has been drained out of the scenes. The original soundtrack, though not a masterpiece, evoked the terror and nightmarish quality of the scenario. On its own, the new score is fine, but it's ineffectively used, and is oftentimes out of place.


Other new scenes include more on Beekman's Diner, a location that was hinted at in the first movie. This is to show us where all the zombies came from. There is also a re-recorded radio broadcast, to further inform us as to why the zombies are numerous. I think an acceptable move here would have been to go with the new broadcast, but leave out all the new scenes. The ending, taking place "One Year Later," provides an unsatisfying finish. The priest, named Reverend Hicks, who was bitten by a ghoul, has survived the infection. Scientists are studying him to figure out why he's okay. Hicks believes that God has spared him for a greater good. Sound familiar? Looks like Russo read Stephen King's The Stand.


Russo tells us that this is what Romero and company wanted to do in 1968, but lacked a large enough budget to accomplish everything. That may be so, but the film has been accepted for what it is for the last 30 years. Tampering with the film won't make it better. If Romero had indeed been involved, perhaps he could have made something worth watching. John Russo is not a good editor or director. Romero would not have allowed for such bad acting. Russo cut out some of Romero's original footage, all of it good, to make room for his material.


The question I must ask myself is, "If this is the film that was released in 1968, would it still be a classic?" That's hard to answer. Romero's footage is excellent, but Russo's footage isn't. As far as my opinion is concerned, I would like this movie if this is the one that had been around for the last 30 years. I would certainly dismiss the beginning and end, but would highly regard mostly everything in between. A three star rating would be fair. However, since this new version came out a few years ago, I can't justify giving a positive rating. Doing so would be to approve of the 30th anniversary edition. I don't approve. Not even Kyra Schon, the actress who plays Karen, approves, and she has voiced her hatred for this film. (She hates the fact that her face is on the cover art.)


The DVD also includes a forgettable "Dance of the Dead" music video, an uninformative making-of featurette and two versions of the film: the "re-edited" version and the original version with the new score. Last, but not least, is a scene from William Hinzman's Flesheater (aka Revenge of the Living Zombies), one of the worst movies ever made. Showing any scene from that piece of trash is a disservice to all mankind! The 30th anniversary edition of Night of the Living Dead arrived with only a little media attention and harsh backlash from fans. If you must see this, see it for the beautiful picture. 1998 was the year of tinkering with horror classics, the other being Gus Van Sant's Psycho.

Fait moi peur!!!!!
Saison 1 et 2!

Un cadeau que moi et ma blodne on s'est fait en allant au Wal=Mart!!!

Je n'avais encore jamais vu ces 2 films, alors je les ai commandé sur internet, ayant adoré Deep Red, Phenomena, Suspiria, Inferno et Trauma.

Deux bons choix !

Aujourd'hui j'ai enfin reçu Hospital Massacre aka. X-Ray (1982) et Night of the Demon (1981). Je donnerai des feedback même si je sais que c'est deux films sont dans une classe à regarder un peu pompette. J'ai acheté pour la bodycount liste impressionante.